Strength score
A simple learning score from 0 to 4, based on the random-character model and a few pattern checks. It is not a professional password audit.
INTERACTIVE SECURITY LEARNING
Try a made-up password and explore its length, character types and predictable patterns. Learn what these signals tell you—and what a simple checker cannot know.
Results update as you type. No account or submission needed.
Maximum 128 characters. Examples stay in this page’s memory.
Type a made-up password or choose a sample to begin.
Password length
0
Unicode code points, including spaces.Random-character model
—
Model bits, not measured password entropy.Model search space
—
Possible combinations under this model.Illustrative guessing time
—
Average at 100 billion guesses/second.Time and search-space values assume independent random characters. They are not predictions for human-created passwords. Common phrases and patterns can be much easier to guess. Non-ASCII examples do not receive these estimates.
Character types are observations, not a required checklist. This basic demo checks only a small set of patterns. It does not check leaked-password databases.
MAKE SENSE OF THE NUMBERS
A simple learning score from 0 to 4, based on the random-character model and a few pattern checks. It is not a professional password audit.
The model counts possible strings using the detected character groups. Its bits describe that mathematical space, assuming each character is chosen randomly.
An illustration using a fixed guessing rate. Actual attacks depend on the password’s predictability, hashing method, hardware and account protections.
Length alone does not describe how a password was selected. A famous quote, familiar phrase or repeated word may be tried much earlier than a random string of the same length.
No. It examines the example you enter and calculates educational estimates. It does not attempt logins, run attacks or contact another system.
The random-character assumption is a poor fit for an obvious pattern. Rather than show a misleading time, the tool explains that predictable guessing can be much faster.
No. They are public examples shown to every visitor. Use them only to explore how the checker works.